Predicting Bad News for Either Islamo-fascists or Democrats
Why would this be bad news for Islamo-fascists: Democrat Could Be 1st Muslim Congressman?
“There are four things which are faasiq (corrupt) and may be killed at all times, whether one is in a state of ihraam [for Hajj and ‘Umrah] or not: kites, crows, mice/rats and mad dogs.” - Narrated by Muslim, 1198. source
In America, Islamo fascism is now faasiq. Its practitoners, supporters and enablers are vermin (fuwaysiqah). But in America we have had no significant Muslim speak out against extremism. Ibraim Hooper, spokesperson for CAIR, is a bureaucrat who has zero religious following in the Muslim community, nor does he have any political influence since he was never elected to office.
Islamic religious leaders of national stature are absent from a key discussion. Can we name even one? Here may finally come a congressman, Keith Ellison, who will have to speak for Islam. He will not be able to avoid doing so. As the the first African-American elected to federal office from Minnesota and the first Muslim to serve in Congress, the press will grant him national notoriety hanging on his every word. He may have more of a chance to reconcile and heal a growing rift within the Muslim community than Senator Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. (D) IL.
Three things may come of his office. If he harbors any support for Islamic terrorists, he will lose office and political career in two years. If he attempts to straddle the fence like Ibrahim Hooper has, he will further define the indecisveness of the Democrat party. If he speaks out against Islamic terrorists, of course, he will set a tone for Muslim citizens that has been missing and engender healthy debate.
Molten Eagle normally makes a policy of no comment upon political activities in other states. This one will have national significance, however. Good or bad, we need a guy like this (not to be construed as an endorsement of lawyers in any political office), in my opinion. You may disagree.
posted by Vigilis @ 5:04 PM
3 comments
3 Comments:
Orange Cross, this is a nation of laws and due process. Currently, some of them are being ignored in my opinion, to salve the sensitivities of proto-Muslims you suggest we call "murderers" rather than Islamo fascists.
I suggest that the tide of political correctness that has been reluctant to offend the seditious and intolerant among us (those who would support or impose sharia law in America) will shift more quickly if Kieth Ellison is elected than not.
It is true under sharia law (as I have quoted) that corrupt vermin should be executed at will. Such a primitive legal code is anathema to the U.S. Constitution.
The proponents, supporters and enablers of sharia law in this country are neither welcomed nor will they be allowed to pursue their program of anonymous, political takeover without opposition the likes of which has not been seen since the early days of communism.
Do you object? If so, that is certainly your right.
Are you a proponent of sharia law to forceably replace America's constitution? That has never been your right, but you are welcomed to try peacefully as long as you do not expect continued anonymnity.
Speech explicitly inciting the forcible overthrow of the government remains punishable under the Smith Act. Speech favoring sharia law in America will be broadcast by our free press with attribution to the speaker(s). Secretive, political speech in mosques organized as not-for-profits has always been illegal, you see, just as it has been in churches and synagogues.
Orange cross, first you refer to these people: "...Muslims who stand together in solidarity to practice their faith, and who take political action, not necessarily violent, to end tolerance of practices outside of their Sharia law.."
That means: Muslims who take possibly violent action to end tolerance outside their Sharia law. Since the U.S. Constitution is outside Sharia law, you seem to be saying its alright for them to end tolerance of the laws of the land. You then suggest that I refrain from demonizing them? Should we just turn the Supreme Court over to proto-Islamists and their Sharia law?
Your suggestion is declined by those who respect America and its founding values. If you have not made yourself clear through some inadvertence, or if you think I have misinterpreted your intent, please try again. You seem to be a good fellow.
Orange cross, here is the problem that makes hollow your entire argument that the term Islamo fascist is pejorative to Islam:
You claim "I'm no fan of fascism, national socialism, Islam, or cargo cult law,..." In other words, you are not Muslim. You are inferring therefore, that true Muslims object to the term as an insult to their peaceful religion, right?
Why is that hollow? Because while we hear that objection from Muslims we do not hear their outrage over the insult done to their religion by the murdering Al Qaeda terrorists. How can we possibly take serious these people if they do not renounce their terrorist offshoot loudly and clearly?
In my opinion, mainstream Americans no longer accept such hypocrisy from Muslims. Again, the tide of political correctness that has been reluctant to offend the seditious and intolerant among us (those who would support or impose sharia law in America) will shift more quickly if Kieth Ellison is elected than not.
Post a Comment
<< Home