Two Submarine Mysteries: Each Not Telling (Yet)
(AUGUST 24, 2016) India's Defense Minister Manohar Parrikar seeks submarine data leak report, navy says no need for alarm.
"The navy also made it clear that the leak did not take place in India. The data, which comprises over 22,000 pages, was leaked, the Australian media reported. It contained documents on the Scorpene submarines, designed by French company DCNS and being built in India by the Mazagaon Dock Limited in Mumbai (Maharashtra) at a cost of around $3.5 billion. The news created ripples in India soon after the report in the Australian media came out."
(AUGUST 25, 2016) France and India Claim Submarine Data Leak Is No Big Security Problem
"France and India on Thursday played down the security risk posed by leaked data on French-designed submarines that a source told Reuters was probably stolen by a French former employee and that has raised concerns over a $38 billion contract with Australia. More than 22,000 pages of data about six submarines that France's DCNS is building for India's navy looked to have been stolen in 2011 by a subcontractor who was fired while providing training in India, the source said."
(SEPTEMBER 3, 2016) Scorpene leak: India shelves plan to expand French submarine order after data breach
"Details of the Scorpene submarine were published in the Australian newspaper last month, triggering concerns that it had become vulnerable even before it was ready to enter service."
M.E.'s Rhetorical question: Which nation is responsible for the submarine data leak (Australia, France, India, none of the foregoing)?
MYSTERY # 2 (Enduring SSBNs; Temporary SSNs)
(FEBRUARY 10, 2017) Navy says more money needed to address submarine maintenance shortfall
"Five attack submarines could be decertified this year if Congress fails to provide more money to the Navy to address maintenance and readiness shortfalls, according to government officials.
The Navy did not immediately respond to a request for comment on which submarines are at risk of decertification."
M.E.'s Rhetorical questions (those serving aboard already know):
Which 5 U.S. submarines are at risk of "decertification"?
Is 5 actually the correct number?