Wednesday, June 14, 2006

Man-induced climate change. Ha-ha-ha!

Even those who consider themselves open-minded should only do so with healthy skepticism.
Finally, the skeptics are gathering a voice counter to what appears to be a well-organized, politically-motivated Global Warming Scam.

The gods are laughing at Al Gore's doozies...
Scientists who work in the fields liberal arts graduate Al Gore wanders through contradict his theories about man-induced climate change. Here are a few excerpts from a short, but informative article the truly open-minded voter should certainly read in full.

the ex-vice president commits numerous basic scientific mistakes:

Gore repeatedly labels carbon dioxide as "global warming pollution" when, in reality, it is no more pollution than is oxygen. CO2 is plant food, an ingredient essential for photosynthesis without which Earth would be a lifeless, frozen ice ball. The hypothesis that human release of CO2 is a major contributor to global warming is just that -- an unproven hypothesis, against which evidence is increasingly mounting. In fact, the correlation between CO2 and temperature that Gore speaks about so confidently is simply non-existent over all meaningful time scales.

Over the intermediate time scales Gore focuses on, the ice cores show that CO2 increases don't precede, and therefore don't cause, warming. Rather, they follow temperature rise -- by as much as 800 years.

It goes on and on and gets better. As Vigilis has quoted before apropos Al Gore, everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege. It is becoming clearer that he is either very dim-witted, or is spearheading a scam for which he has a financial conflict of interest. In fact, his interest in the recent movie An Inconvenient Truth, could be offset by production costs claimed as advertising/marketing for his investment company, based in London. Shameful, really shameful, but not illegal.

Mr. Gore, and the scientists doing the environmental alarm mongering will die much richer before the accuracy or error of their arguments can ever be proven. - Vigilis


Post a Comment

<< Home